Skip to content
CFD Simulation

CFD Simulation

Analyze & Simulate anything !

  • Home
  • Simulation gallery
    • Spray Dryers : All studies
    • Case Studies
      • Covid-19 pandemic
      • Covid 19 – Keeping indoors safe
      • Covid-19 Dispersion Model
      • Surfside Champlain Towers
    • Learn Solid & Fluid Analysis
      • CFD of a Butterfly Valve
    • Human Space Flight
      • Space Shuttle CFD
      • Aircraft Aerodynamics Performance
      • Space Exploration
      • Rocket Science
  • CFD Tube gallery
    • Flow Simulation TCAE
      • Centrifugal Pump
      • Centrifugal Fan Optimization
      • Potsdam Propeller
    • Football
      • Simulation of head kick in football/ soccer
    • Simulation and Analysis of Car Crash
      • Dummy without seatbelt impacting airbag
      • Static Structural Simulation of a teleferic or telpher cable car
      • Car braking with dummy under 3 point seatbelt at 150g deceleration
      • Car bumper impacting hip on 2 directions at 36 km/h
      • Heavy truck impacting a concrete barrier
      • Static Structural Simulation of a teleferic or telpher cable car
      • Truck with loose cargo brakes with 100g deceleration
    • Covid 19 – Gama Platform
    • Brain and Blast Injuries
    • Nuclear Blast CFD Simulation
    • Spaced Armor Penetration
    • Armor Penetration Simulation
      • Ultra Porcelain Armor
      • Explaining mechanics – Armor penetration
      • Energetic Reactive Armor
      • Javelin Simulation
      • Concrete Armor | M4A3
      • Concrete Armor Comparison
      • Merkava I vs T-72A
        • Defeating Modern Armor
    • Anti Tank Simulation
      • 80mm Mortar grenade
      • RP-3 ROCKET vs TIGER
      • 152mm HE vs Tiger II
      • Panzer IV F2 vs Valentine V
      • T-72 vs M1 Abrams
      • T34 | Combat Analysis
      • T90 Third Generation Russian Tank
      • Multiple Impact Simulation
    • Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
      • Electric Turbo Innovation
  • Modeling and Computational Simulation
    • Simulation of Car Crash
    • Electrochemical Energy Storage
      • Lithium-sulfur batteries
      • Metal-Air batteries
      • Na based batteries
      • Supercapacitors
    • Covid-19 pandemic
  • FEA & CFD – MESH GALLERY
    • CFD Support, Czech Republic
      • Simulation of a Francis Turbine
    • Catfish Drone CFD Simulation
    • CFD Analysis of Football
    • Computational Fliud dynamics
    • Cyclone Simulation
    • Eiffel tower CFD Simulation
    • Flow Simulation Ship Propeller
    • GRIDPRO
    • M113 – Combat Vehicle Mesh for FEA
    • Milling & Turning – CNC
    • NUSCALE POWER PLANT MESH
    • Patriot Car Bumper
    • University of Munich – Research & Methods
      • Gallery – CFD –
      • Tangible CFD
    • Unmanned Combat Vehicle Mesh
  • Human Health
    • EMBRYO TRANSFER
      • Outcome Measures
      • Ectopic and Early Pregnancy Loss
    • CFD SIMULATION SAVES LIVES
    • Virtual Surgery CFD Study
      • Glosary
    • Normozoospermia
    • Sperm Motility Scores
  • Submarine
    • CFD of Submarines
  • R&D – Innovation
    • Capabilities
    • Current
    • Past
    • Future
  • Armor Penetration
  • #CFD Simulation
  • #CFD Tube
  • #CFD learn
  • #CFD Simulation
  • E-mail
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Get free meshing and request for Quote
  • User
  • Login
    • Password Reset
  • Register
  • Logout
  • Jobs
  • Toggle search form

Additional cases

Posted on February 14, 2024February 14, 2024 By mechalab761691 No Comments on Additional cases

After numerical simulation and result analysis, the conclusion is that a 30mm armor-piercing projectile at an impact speed of 750m/s achieves the full penetration effect on 30mm thick plates while in the case of a 40mm thickness, it jams into the plate.
For different purposes, it is of great importance to determine the limit (maximum) plate thickness for which the projectile with defined ballistic and material characteristics is able to achieve the full penetration effect.
For the additional simulation cases, the same input parameters are used for the projectile, and the only difference is the armor plate thickness.
Additional numerical simulations are carried out in accordance with the previously defined models using the same initial and boundary conditions. It is found that the full penetration effect is achieved on plates
with a thickness of up to 33mm, and after increasing the thickness to higher values, a limited penetration effect then occurs.

Case 3 – Plate thickness of 33mm

Figures 24-29 show the Von Misses equivalent stress and penetration effect for armor plate Weldox 460 with a thickness of 33mm.

Popular Stories Right now
Predicting Rocket Blast Environments
Exemple de visualisation de COMOKIT, dans laquelle sont comparés les impacts, en terme de propagation du virus, de la proportion d’individus portant des masques (cas d’étude de la commune de Son Loi, Vinh Phuc, Vietnam) :
Finite Element Modeling and Simulation of Car Crash

Figure 24 – Von Misses equivalent stress, step 1 – case 3
Figure 25 – Von Misses equivalent stress, step 2 – case 3
Figure 26 – Von Misses equivalent stress, step 3 – case 3
Figure 27 – Von Misses equivalent stress, step 4 – case 3
Figure 28 – Von Misses equivalent stress, step 5 – case 3
Figure 29 – Von Misses equivalent stress, step 6 – case 3

As the results from Figures 24-29 show, the projectile has sufficient kinetic energy to achieve the full penetration effect in the plate of a thickness of 33mm. A large number of fragments are created behind the
armor plate as separated parts of both the projectile and the plate.
Figure 30 shows the projectile velocity from the moment when it starts penetration into the plate until the moment of passing through the plate.
The projectile velocity after penetration is 70m/s.

Figure 30 – Projectile speed as a function of time – case 3

Figure 31 shows plate displacement as a function of time. It shows that the first movement of the plate occurs after 0.1ms. The maximum plate displacement is 1.2mm.

Figure 31 – Plate displacement as a function of time – case 3

Case 4 – Plate thickness of 34mm

Figures 32-37 show the Von Misses equivalent stress and penetration effect for armor plate Weldox 460 with a thickness of 34mm.

Figure 32 – Von Misses equivalent stress, step 1 – case 4
Figure 33 – Von Misses equivalent stress, step 2 – case 4
Figure 34 – Von Misses equivalent stress, step 3 – case 4
Figure 35 – Von Misses equivalent stress, step 4 – case 4
Figure 36 – Von Misses equivalent stress, step 5 – case 4
Figure 37 – Von Misses equivalent stress, step 6 – case 4

As the results from Figures 32-37 show, the projectile does not have sufficient kinetic energy to achieve the penetration effect in the plate of a thickness of 34mm. After collision with the plate, the projectile jams into
the plate. But, differently from case 2 with the 40mm plate, in this case projectile’s semi penetration creates a number of fragments, which can also have a big impact on potential targets behind the plate. Figure 38
shows the projectile velocity from the moment when it starts penetration into the plate until the moment when it jams into the plate after 0.3ms.

Figure 38 – Projectile speed as a function of time – case 4

Figure 39 shows plate displacement as a function of time. It shows that the first movement of the plate occurs after 0.1ms.

The maximum plate displacement is 1.4mm.

Figure 39 – Plate displacement as a function of time – case 4

Conclusion

Armor-piercing projectiles are designed to penetrate either body armor or vehicle armor. Due to their high kinetic energy at the time of impact with an obstacle and their body’s exceptional endurance, they are
able to penetrate armor.
It is extremely difficult to represent the impact of an armor-piercing projectile, but the models created successfully describe the real issue of projectile penetration (or with a certain deviation). In recent times, analysis using the finite element method has proven to be one of effective approaches to solving such and similar problems.
In this paper, a numerical simulation of the penetration process of a 30mm anti-aircraft armor projectile into Weldox 460 alloy plates of different thicknesses was performed.

Spasić (2018) has also taken into account the analysis of Weldox 460 armor steel during numerical modeling of a projectile impact on metal structures and shown its behavior when it is in collision with projectiles of different shapes.
Based on a detailed review of the literature, it is found that deformation, strain rate, temperature, and pressure are the key factors that have the greatest influence on the penetration process.

In order to correctly describe these phenomena, it is necessary to define equations of state and models of material behavior. The Johnson–Cook material model and the Mie–Grüneisen equation of state were used
to define the models.
To determine the maximum penetrating ability of the projectile, four simulation cases with different plate thicknesses were performed.
In case 1, with a plate thickness of 30mm, and case 3, with a plate thickness of 33mm, the projectile had the full penetration effect into the defined plates, because the projectile’s impact velocity and kinetic energy
were higher than needed for the full penetration effect. The projectile velocity behind the plate in case 1 is 220m/s, and in case 3 the velocity is 70m/s.
In case 2, the projectile jammed into the plate with a thickness of 40mm, while in case 4, the projectile jammed into the plate with a thickness of 34mm, but its semi-penetration generated a larger number of fragments behind the plate. In all four cases, the first plate displacements occur after 0.1ms of the analysis.
The projectile with the defined ballistic material and characteristics has the ability to fully penetrate the Weldox 460 plate with a maximum thickness of 33mm.

The calculated ballistic armor steel plate thickness of 33mm is not produced as a standard monobloc plate, but in reality, this thickness can be achieved as a sandwich armor plate with one thicker (e.g., 30mm) and
one thinner plate (e.g., 3mm), or with one 30mm plate placed at some angle to the vertical axis.
When defining the ballistic protection of an armored vehicle against projectiles of defined characteristics, it is necessary to use armor steel with a thickness greater than the calculated one in order to neutralize a
potential effect of separate fragments from the other side of the plate.
Despite the fact that analytical and numerical methods of calculation can provide correct data about the character of certain phenomena, it is always desirable and necessary, first of all, to carry out experimental tests on the training ground and, after obtaining certain results, to make the necessary corrections and examine the given phenomenon with numerical methods in order to solve the problem more easily and economically.

Armor Penetration Tags:Armor penetration, depleted uranium, plate thickness, projectile

Post navigation

Previous Post: Numerical analysis of the penetration process of a 30mm armor-piercing projectile
Next Post: 8cm Mortar Grenade vs KV-1 Top Armor | Overpressure | Explosion Blast

More Related Articles

Numerical analysis of the penetration process of a 30mm armor-piercing projectile Armor Penetration

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About Mechalab

Mechalab Limited is a UK-registered company trading in England and Wales. By Post : Mechalab Ltd 49 Station road - BN26 6EA Polegate - East Sussex - United Kingdom Phone : 07 342 212 398

By email : info@mechalab.co.uk

Copyright © 2026 CFD Simulation.

Powered by PressBook Blog WordPress theme