Category: Anti Tank Simulation

BTR-4 vs T-72 Multiple Impact Simulation | 30mm 3UBR8 APDS Armor Piercing Simulation

December 16, 2022November 21, 2023 mechalab761691 No Comments

The BTR-4 is an 8×8 wheeled armored personnel carrier (APC) developed in Ukraine, while the T-72 is a Soviet-designed main battle tank. The BTR-4 is designed for transporting infantry and providing fire support, while the T-72 is a heavily armored tank with a primary focus on engaging enemy armored vehicles. The 30mm 3UBR8 APDS is…

Multiple Impact Simulation

RP-3 ROCKET vs TIGER | 152mm High Explosive Rocket Armour Piercing Simulation

December 16, 2022November 21, 2023 mechalab761691 No Comments

Comparing the RP-3 rocket and the Soviet Tiger 152mm rocket in a simulation scenario involves examining various factors like design, capabilities, and intended use. The RP-3 rocket was a British WWII-era air-to-ground rocket used primarily against ground targets, featuring a variety of warheads for different purposes, including high-explosive, armor-piercing, and shaped-charge versions. On the other…

RP-3 ROCKET vs TIGER

Panzer IV F2 vs Valentine V | Armor Penetration Simulation | 7.5cm Pzgr 39

May 7, 2022September 15, 2023 mechalab761691 2 Comments

In this simulation, you’re comparing the penetration capability of a Panzer IV Ausf F2 tank firing a 7.5cm Pzgr 39 APCBC projectile at a Valentine Mk V tank with 50mm angled armor at 56 degrees. The key factors here are the projectile’s characteristics and the armor’s properties. The Panzer IV Ausf F2 was equipped with…

Anti Tank Simulation, CFD Tube gallery, Panzer IV F2 vs Valentine V

T-72 vs M1 Abrams | Armor Penetration Simulation | NERA

April 25, 2022August 30, 2023 mechalab761691 1 Comment

Simulating the interaction between a 125mm 3BM9 APFSDS projectile fired from a T-72 tank and the frontal armor of an M1 Abrams tank as described requires some complex calculations and modeling. While I can’t perform real-time simulations, I can provide you with some insights into how such an interaction might be analyzed using general principles…

Anti Tank Simulation, Armor Penetration Simulation, T-72 vs M1 Abrams

152mm HE vs Tiger II | Armor Penetration Simulation | High Explosive

April 25, 2022August 30, 2023 mechalab761691 No Comments

Simulating the impact of a 125mm 3BM9 APFSDS projectile hitting the frontal armor of an M1 Abrams tank requires considering various factors, including the projectile’s velocity, diameter, material properties, and the layered composition of the Abrams’ armor. However, I should note that the following analysis is a simplified estimation and doesn’t account for all the…

152mm HE vs Tiger II, Anti Tank Simulation, Armor Penetration Simulation

T90 HE vs M1 ABRAMS

March 24, 2022August 30, 2023 mechalab761691 No Comments

Combat Analysis and Simulation

Anti Tank Simulation, T90 Third Generation Russian Tank

T34 | Armor Penetration Simulation

March 24, 2022August 30, 2023 mechalab761691 No Comments

Mechalab offers simulation services that can include armor penetration simulations. By submitting your drawings and simulations, our high-performance computing resources can be utilized to run simulations for armor penetration analysis. This can help scientists and engineers in the field of defense, security, or related industries to evaluate the effectiveness of different materials, designs, or projectiles…

Anti Tank Simulation, T34 | Combat Analysis

High Explosive Anti Tank Simulation

March 10, 2022August 30, 2023 mechalab761691 No Comments

Ballistic testing is a vital part of the armor design. However, it is impossible to test every condition and it is necessary to limit the number of tests to cut huge costs. With the introduction of hydrocodes and high performance computers; there is an increasing interest on simulation studies to cutoff these aforementioned costs. This…

Anti Tank Simulation, Non classé