Skip to content
CFD Simulation

CFD Simulation

Analyze & Simulate anything !

  • Home
  • Simulation gallery
    • Spray Dryers : All studies
    • Case Studies
      • Covid-19 pandemic
      • Covid 19 – Keeping indoors safe
      • Covid-19 Dispersion Model
      • Surfside Champlain Towers
    • Learn Solid & Fluid Analysis
      • CFD of a Butterfly Valve
    • Human Space Flight
      • Space Shuttle CFD
      • Aircraft Aerodynamics Performance
      • Space Exploration
      • Rocket Science
  • CFD Tube gallery
    • Flow Simulation TCAE
      • Centrifugal Pump
      • Centrifugal Fan Optimization
      • Potsdam Propeller
    • Football
      • Simulation of head kick in football/ soccer
    • Simulation and Analysis of Car Crash
      • Dummy without seatbelt impacting airbag
      • Static Structural Simulation of a teleferic or telpher cable car
      • Car braking with dummy under 3 point seatbelt at 150g deceleration
      • Car bumper impacting hip on 2 directions at 36 km/h
      • Heavy truck impacting a concrete barrier
      • Static Structural Simulation of a teleferic or telpher cable car
      • Truck with loose cargo brakes with 100g deceleration
    • Covid 19 – Gama Platform
    • Brain and Blast Injuries
    • Nuclear Blast CFD Simulation
    • Spaced Armor Penetration
    • Armor Penetration Simulation
      • Ultra Porcelain Armor
      • Explaining mechanics – Armor penetration
      • Energetic Reactive Armor
      • Javelin Simulation
      • Concrete Armor | M4A3
      • Concrete Armor Comparison
      • Merkava I vs T-72A
        • Defeating Modern Armor
    • Anti Tank Simulation
      • 80mm Mortar grenade
      • RP-3 ROCKET vs TIGER
      • 152mm HE vs Tiger II
      • Panzer IV F2 vs Valentine V
      • T-72 vs M1 Abrams
      • T34 | Combat Analysis
      • T90 Third Generation Russian Tank
      • Multiple Impact Simulation
    • Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
      • Electric Turbo Innovation
  • Modeling and Computational Simulation
    • Simulation of Car Crash
    • Electrochemical Energy Storage
      • Lithium-sulfur batteries
      • Metal-Air batteries
      • Na based batteries
      • Supercapacitors
    • Covid-19 pandemic
  • FEA & CFD – MESH GALLERY
    • Catfish Drone CFD Simulation
    • CFD Analysis of Football
    • Computational Fliud dynamics
    • Cyclone Simulation
    • Eiffel tower CFD Simulation
    • Flow Simulation Ship Propeller
    • GRIDPRO
    • M113 – Combat Vehicle Mesh for FEA
    • Milling & Turning – CNC
    • NUSCALE POWER PLANT MESH
    • Patriot Car Bumper
    • University of Munich – Research & Methods
      • Gallery – CFD –
      • Tangible CFD
    • Unmanned Combat Vehicle Mesh
  • Human Health
    • EMBRYO TRANSFER
      • Outcome Measures
      • Ectopic and Early Pregnancy Loss
    • CFD SIMULATION SAVES LIVES
    • Virtual Surgery CFD Study
      • Glosary
    • Normozoospermia
    • Sperm Motility Scores
  • Submarine
    • CFD of Submarines
  • R&D – Innovation
    • Capabilities
    • Current
    • Past
    • Future
  • Armor Penetration
  • #CFD Simulation
  • #CFD Tube
  • #CFD learn
  • #CFD Simulation
  • E-mail
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Get free meshing and request for Quote
  • User
  • Login
    • Password Reset
  • Register
  • Logout
  • Jobs
  • Toggle search form
Merkava I vs T-72A | Armor penetration Simulation

Merkava I vs T-72A | Armor penetration Simulation

Posted on May 25, 2022August 29, 2023 By mechalab761691 No Comments on Merkava I vs T-72A | Armor penetration Simulation

To simulate the interaction between the 105mm M111 APFSDS projectile fired from a Merkava I tank and the frontal armor of a T-72A tank, we can use the concept of armor penetration calculations. The penetration of a kinetic energy penetrator like an APFSDS round depends on several factors, including the projectile’s velocity, mass, and shape, as well as the target’s armor composition and angle of impact.

In this scenario, the key components we need are the projectile’s kinetic energy (KE) and the target’s effective armor thickness. The KE of the projectile can be calculated using the formula:

KE = 0.5 * mass * velocity^2

Where:

  • Mass of the projectile = ~3.6 kg (including penetrator and cylinders)
  • Velocity of the projectile = 1390 m/s

Let’s calculate the KE of the projectile:
KE = 0.5 * 3.6 kg * (1390 m/s)^2 = ~3.04 MJ

Now, let’s calculate the effective armor thickness of the T-72A’s frontal armor. The combination of different layers and angles of armor is somewhat complex, but we can use the concept of effective armor thickness to simplify calculations. The effective armor thickness takes into account the resistance of different armor layers against penetration.

Popular Stories Right now
Killing coronavirus indoors with CFD simulation
Capabilities for manufacturing prototypes and small production
Metal-Air Battery (ChatGPT based)

Effective Armor Thickness = (Thickness of RHA layer 1) + (Thickness of glass textolite layers) + (Thickness of RHA layer 2 / cosine(angle))

Where:

  • Thickness of RHA layer 1 = 60 mm
  • Thickness of glass textolite layers = 2 * 52.5 mm = 105 mm
  • Thickness of RHA layer 2 = 50 mm
  • Angle of impact = 68 degrees (cosine of 68 degrees is approximately 0.3919)

Effective Armor Thickness = 60 mm + 105 mm + (50 mm / 0.3919) = ~231 mm

Now, we can use the concept of armor penetration to estimate whether the projectile will penetrate the effective armor thickness of the T-72A:

Penetration = (Projectile KE) / (Effective Armor Thickness)

Penetration = 3.04 MJ / 231 mm = ~13.18 MJ/mm

The penetration value of approximately 13.18 MJ/mm is a rough estimate and indicates the kinetic energy available for penetration per unit thickness of armor.

Moreover :
To simulate the interaction between the Merkava I’s 105mm M111 APFSDS projectile and the frontal armor of the T-72A tank, we can use basic armor penetration calculations. The penetration formula is not exact and real-world results may vary due to factors such as projectile quality, armor quality, and other variables. However, this will give you a rough estimate of the outcome.

The penetration capability of an APFSDS round can be estimated using the formula:

Penetration = (Kinetic Energy^2 * Penetrator Constant) / (Target Armor Thickness * Density)

Where:

  • Kinetic Energy = 0.5 * Mass * Velocity^2
  • Penetrator Constant is a material-specific constant.
  • Target Armor Thickness is the total thickness of the armor layers facing the projectile.
  • Density is the density of the target armor material.

For Tungsten Alloy, the penetrator constant is around 250,000 (in units of g^0.5 / cm^2).
The density of Tungsten Alloy is about 19.3 g/cm^3.

For Rolled Homogeneous Armor (RHA), the density is about 7.8 g/cm^3.

Let’s plug in the values:

Merkava I Projectile:

  • Mass = 3.6 kg
  • Velocity = 1390 m/s (at 1.5 km)

T-72A Armor:

  • Total Armor Thickness = 60mm + 52.5mm + 52.5mm + 50mm = 215mm
  • Density = 7.8 g/cm^3

Calculating kinetic energy:
Kinetic Energy = 0.5 * 3.6 kg * (1390 m/s)^2

Calculating penetration:
Penetration = (Kinetic Energy^2 * Penetrator Constant) / (Target Armor Thickness * Density)

Please note that this calculation doesn’t take into account factors like obliquity (angle of impact) or the potential effects of additional layers such as glass textolite.

Keep in mind that real-world armor penetration is influenced by various factors, including projectile design, target design, armor quality, and obliquity. This estimation provides a simplified approximation and might not accurately represent the complex behavior of armor penetration in combat scenarios. If you’re looking for more accurate results, sophisticated simulation software is often used by defense analysts and engineers to model such interactions.

Merkava I vs T-72A

Post navigation

Previous Post: Concrete Armor | M4A3 | Armor penetration Simulation
Next Post: A CFD Analysis of Cyclone Separator

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About Mechalab

Mechalab Limited is a UK-registered company trading in England and Wales. By Post : Mechalab Ltd 49 Station road - BN26 6EA Polegate - East Sussex - United Kingdom Phone : 07 342 212 398

By email : info@mechalab.co.uk

Copyright © 2025 CFD Simulation.

Powered by PressBook Blog WordPress theme